
Information about the myPerformance evaluation timeline, online training, and help can be found on this flyer. Click on the button below to get your copy!
Contact the Performance Management Team by using the link below!
There could be several reasons:
myPerformance is software designed to aid Wichita State University staff in managing performance of their employees. It is a tool that will facilitate conversations about performance between employees and managers. myPerformance helps each employee understand expectations of their role and how they are achieving their assigned competencies and goals. The design also feeds into our University’s Strategic Plan and is a foundation for employee growth and future career options. Currently, it houses evaluations for all USS and non-teaching UP employees.
Direct Managers must log in to myPerformance during the Planning and Mid-Review Step of each review period to input or modify comments on competencies and goals for their employees. At the end of the evaluation cycle, a direct manager will also need to rate their employee(s) on University competencies, and submit an electronic signature. Direct Managers are expected to meet with their employees at regular intervals during the review period to convey competency and goal expectations, address receptivity, and express rating explanations.
The minimum requirement of an employee is to electronically sign the evaluation at the end of the review period in order to acknowledge that the employee received the evaluation. (The signature does not imply the employee agrees or disagrees with the ratings.) myPeformance also allows employees the opportunity to provide a self-evaluation for the review period by providing comments to competencies and goals or any other achievements or issues before the manager completes their final rating.
Indirect Managers do not have any required duties in myPerformance, however the software provides Indirect Managers with the opportunity to view any of their indirect reports’ evaluations at any time throughout the review period. This allows Indirect Managers to evaluate how timely their direct reports are completing their evaluations, which affects how they will rate their direct reports on the Leadership Competency. It also allows them the ability to see how well indirect reports are performing during any given time.
There are 5 steps in the review process:
The Annual evaluation period timeline is:
This section is optional and will not be rated. Managers can input goals during planning or at various times throughout Step 1. Best practice is to allow performance on employee goals be tied to actual competencies.
When completing this section, the manager should provide specific examples of work
expected that demonstrate how the competency would be rated. Job duties from the employee’s
position description should be tied to the competencies. These examples should be
added in the Comment box that appear under each competency.
Managers can make multiple entries in the Comments box during the time assigned to
Step 1. This will include comments documenting mid-evaluation progress and discussion
with the employee. Managers may include additional comments such as foreseen barriers,
changes, or amendments.
If at any time, a manager feels their employee is not performing to expectations, the manager should contact their Human Resources Business Partner for guidance.
Yes, myPerformance is designed to re-assign a new evaluation to anyone who has a new position number.
To change your myPerformance profile picture:
myPerformance training provides an overview of myPerformance for employees, managers, and indirect managers. The training focuses on the navigation of myPerformance to complete the evaluation process, including all steps in the evaluation cycle, the self-evaluation process, and the signature process. Managers and employees can register for training through myTraining in myWSU or go to our myPerformance Training page.
SME: SP/SRAP
Updated: 06/13/2023 NH