The Student Code of Conduct Handbook ("Handbook") outlines how the University will proceed once it is made aware of allegations of misconduct by a Student, Student Group, or Student Organization. The Handbook also serves as a companion document to Policy 8.05 / Student Code of Conduct. The Student Conduct Process, as defined herein, is administered by the office of Student Conduct and Community Standards ("SCCS") in accordance with this Handbook. The Student Conduct Process is designed to investigate and resolve alleged student misconduct violations in a prompt, thorough, reliable, fair, and impartial manner.
Wichita State University is a living, learning, and working community dedicated to the personal and academic growth of its students and serves as an educational, cultural, and economic driver for Kansas and the greater public good. The University also endeavors to provide Students with the necessary tools to engage in effective communication and to resolve conflicts appropriately.
Freedom of inquiry and freedom of expression are valued as critical components in the generation and transfer of knowledge to advance the University's mission. This Handbook is designed for the promotion and protection of an environment that encourages reasoned discourse, integrity, intellectual honesty, openness to constructive change, and respect for the rights and responsibilities of all individuals.
By choosing to become a member of the University Community, Students are expected to demonstrate respect for themselves and others and to conduct themselves in a manner that is consistent with the Kansas Board of Regents and Wichita State University rules and policies; and federal, state, and local laws. When choosing to become a part of the University Community, the Student must understand that they will be required to adhere to University Policy. Being a member of the University Community is a privilege, and the Student Conduct Process will determine if a Student's conduct warrants the revocation of that privilege.
This policy applies to behavior that is committed:
Behaviors subject to review under this policy include those which occur:
The following outlines what Complainants and Respondents should expect as they engage in the Student Conduct Process.
As members of the university community all students, student groups, and student organizations are expected to display respect for the rights of themselves and others and to be accountable for their behavior choices.
It is a violation of the student code of conduct for any student, student group, or student organization to engage in behavior that aids, attempts, assists, promotes, condones, encourages, requires, conceals, or facilitates any act prohibited by university policy, including this handbook. Allowing, permitting, or providing an opportunity for a visitor to violate university policy is also prohibited. Lack of familiarity with university policy, intoxication or impairment from alcohol, drugs, or other substances shall not be an excuse or a defense to a violation of university policy. Unless specifically noted in the policy definition, intent is not a required element to establish a university policy violation. The sccs will consider the legitimacy of an individual's explanation when determining appropriate sanctioning.
Conduct prohibited by university policy 3.06 / Sexual Harassment, Discrimination and Retaliation For Employees, Students and Visitors; and 3.19 / Prohibition of Retaliation shall be received, investigated and resolved pursuant to those university policies and university policy 3.47 / Discrimination Review Procedures For Students, Employees And Visitors, as applicable. Additional allegations of misconduct, that are not governed by these university policies but are included in the same underlying conduct, may be resolved by the student conduct process outlined in this handbook.
Violations of the student code of conduct may also result in a further review and/or investigation under other university policies. Some examples of these university policies include, but are not limited to, policies 3.06 / Sexual Harassment, Discrimination And Retaliation For Employees, Students And Visitors, 3.19 / Prohibition of Retaliation, and 3.47 / Discrimination Review Procedures For Students, Employees And Visitors.
The following list describes actions that detract from the effectiveness of the university community and are prohibited, but does not include constitutionally protected activity:
engaging in prohibited conduct as described by Policy 2.17 / Student Academic Integrity
engaging in the intentional, unintentional, reckless, and/or unauthorized defacement, damage, or destruction of University property or the property of another. This includes all acts of vandalism.
engaging in relationship violence as described by Policy 3.06 / Sexual Harassment, Discrimination and Retaliation for Employees, Students and Visitors. Any alleged violation of this policy will be directed to the Office of Civil Rights, Title IX & ADA Compliance.
engaging in, or causing another to engage in, adverse action or threat of adverse action against any individual or group involved in the complaint, investigation, and/or resolution of an allegation of a violation of University Policy; including any individual who attempts to intervene or prevent behavior prohibited by this policy. Retaliation can be committed by anyone. Retaliation can take many forms including threats, intimidation, pressuring, continued harassment, violence, or other forms of harm to others.
engaging in sexual misconduct as described by Policy 3.06 / Sexual Harassment, Discrimination and Retaliation for Employees, Students and Visitors. Any alleged violation of this policy will be directed to the Office of Civil Rights, Title IX & ADA Compliance.
engaging in unauthorized canvassing or solicitation including, but not limited to, the following: sending advertisements or recruitment materials via Blackboard, listservs, or other forms of communication not intended for canvassing or solicitation; or placing flyers under and/or on doors in University facilities, or on vehicles parked on University Premises.
engaging in stalking as described by Policy 3.06 / Sexual Harassment, Discrimination and Retaliation for Employees, Students and Visitors. Any alleged violation of this policy will be directed to the Office of Civil Rights, Title IX & ADA Compliance.
engaging in the taking, misappropriation, or possession of University property or the property of another including anything of value, goods, services, funds, and/or other valuables or possession of property that can be reasonably determined to have been stolen.
engaging in the use of any tobacco product or device including, but not limited to, cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, vaping, hookah, or chewing tobacco within University property or vehicles as defined by Policy 11.11 / Tobacco Free Campus.
conducting, organizing, or participating in any gambling activity except as expressly permitted by law and University policy.
engaging in the unauthorized use of any unpiloted aerial system on University premises or at University-related activities except as expressly permitted by law and University Policy. Authorization for use of an unpiloted aerial system must be obtained from the University Police Department.
engaging in the possession, use, sale, distribution, or display of any firearm, replica firearm, ammunition, weapon, replica weapon, or similar device unless expressly permitted by law and/or University policy. This includes the use of any object or material to cause or threaten physical harm. For a listing of prohibited weapons refer to Policy 11.19 / Prohibiting Weapons on University Property.
The University considers the health and safety of members of the University Community and its Visitors to be a top priority. The University recognizes a Student's concern for potential disciplinary action related to use or possession of alcohol, drugs, and/or other substances may hinder their actions in response to an emergency or medical situation. To alleviate those concerns and ensure that Students and their Visitors receive prompt, appropriate care, the University has adopted the following Responsible Action Protocol:
In summary, a Student who is under the influence of alcohol or drugs at the time of a mental health crisis, medical emergency, or sexual assault, should not be reluctant to seek assistance for that reason. When a reporting party, responding Student, third-party reporter, or Witness to an incident of a mental health crisis, medical emergency, or sexual assault, participates in a good faith report, SCCS will not pursue disciplinary violations related to the impermissible drug or alcohol use against any of the involved student(s).
All Students, Student Groups, Student Organizations, and Witnesses who are members of the University Community have the following responsibilities relating to all investigations and resolution processes related to reports of alleged violations of the Student Code of Conduct:
All participants are expected to be honest and forthright in all communication relating to the investigation and resolution of allegations of misconduct. Providing false or misleading information is a violation of University Policy and may result in additional allegations of misconduct under the Handbook or other applicable University Policy.
The University uses @shockers.wichita.edu e-mail addresses as its formal means of communication with Students and @wichita.edu for University Officials. Communication regarding an investigation and/or resolution process is deemed given when sent to an official @shockers.wichita.edu e-mail address. Students and University Officials are responsible for checking their University e-mail and responding to all requests for information or other responses in a timely manner. Failure to respond or appear by a given deadline may result in the process proceeding in an individual's absence. Decisions will be made on the information that is available at the time the decision is made.
All Complainants, Respondents, and Witnesses are responsible for adequately preparing themselves for investigation and resolution meetings, including reviewing applicable University Policies and procedures. Students, Student Groups, and Student Organizations are also responsible for ensuring that their Advisor is familiar with the appropriate policies and procedures. Students, Student Groups, and Student Organizations are also responsible for ensuring their Witnesses attend the hearing. Failure to adequately prepare for a scheduled meeting is not a reason to delay the meeting or other proceedings.
Individuals, Student Groups, and Student Organizations are to refrain from disrupting the orderly process of the investigation and resolution process for alleged violations of University Policy. No individual, Student Group, or Student Organization involved in the process other than the investigator, Conduct Administrator, or hearing board chairperson may audio or video record any investigation or resolution meetings or other portions of the process. Any individual, Student Group, or Student Organization deemed to be disruptive may be removed from a meeting and/or charged with violating the Student Code of Conduct.
Student Organizations are expected to comply with all University Policies, including the Student Code of Conduct and all additional policies pertaining to Student Organizations. Student Organizations should act in a manner that promotes and upholds the standards of the University. Isolated violations of individuals are generally not chargeable to the Student Organization. When evidence of group conduct exists, however, Student Organizations may be held responsible for the actions and behaviors of their members and/or guests.
On a case-by-case basis, Student Conduct and Community Standards staff, in consultation with Student Engagement and Belonging (SEB) staff, will determine whether any violations of policy are individual or organizational. To determine if a violation is organizational, all circumstances of a situation will be examined. SCCC staff will take into account the following non-exhaustive list of factors, including, but not limited to the following.
Should there be evidence of at least three (3) factors present in a violation, the associated Student Organization(s) may be held responsible for the violations in question.
If a pattern of individual violations exists without proper and appropriate organizational control, remedy, or sanction.
If the violation(s) occurred at or in connection with an activity that reasonable people would associate and/or attribute to the Student Organization;
Additionally, if the conduct violation(s) is possibly an organizational responsibility, SCCS staff will consult with the Vice President for Student Affairs or their designee regarding potential interim measures, up to and including temporary suspension, of the Student Organization. Any decision regarding interim measures that include temporary suspension of a Student Organization must come from the Vice President for Student Affairs or their designee.
Once organizational responsibility has been determined by SCCS staff, a summary of rationale will be submitted by SCCS staff investigators and included in the informational packet provided to the Hearing Board and Student Organization. The Hearing Board may consider testimony and evidence from the Student Organization to dispute a finding of organizational responsibility.
If the Hearing Board affirms the finding of organizational responsibility, a disagreement of that finding is not grounds for an appeal by itself.
The University encourages Students, University Officials, and other University Community members to resolve conflicts informally and at the lowest level.
Any individual may report alleged Student, Student Group, or Student Organization misconduct to SCCS. An online reporting form can be found at the Report It page. The report should describe the alleged misconduct and identify the Student(s), Student Group(s), and/or Student Organization(s) involved. Submitted allegations of misconduct will be reviewed by the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or their designee. If there appears to be reliable information indicating that a violation may have occurred, the Student Conduct Process will be initiated. The University also reserves the right to initiate the Student Conduct Process without a formal complaint, including any anonymous reports. Reports may also be addressed through other non-conduct procedures.
In all cases, a decision will be made on existing facts to determine if an investigation is necessary for compliance with legal requirements and/or to protect the living, learning, and/or working environment for all members of the University Community. Individuals are encouraged to report alleged misconduct as soon as possible after the incident occurs to maximize the University's ability to respond promptly and effectively; however, the University does not limit the time for reporting. Prompt reporting allows for the University to obtain the most reliable information, contact relevant Witnesses, and provide reasonable assistance and interim measures for affected parties.
The University presumes reports of alleged policy violations are made in good faith. An outcome that finds the reported behavior does not constitute a violation of University Policy, or that there is insufficient information to conclude that the incident occurred as reported, does not mean that the report was made in bad faith. The University encourages all individuals who have experienced or witnessed behavior they believe violates the Student Code of Conduct to report the matter so that it may be addressed by the University.
A preliminary investigation of the information provided may be necessary to determine if there is credible information that warrants notifying a Student, Student Group, or Student Organization of alleged policy violation(s). The preliminary investigation is a neutral fact-finding process that is used to determine whether there is sufficient information to warrant action by the University. Preliminary meetings with the Complainant and/or Witnesses may occur before initiating the Student Conduct Process or contacting the Respondent. If the Respondent is contacted about the case during the preliminary investigation, the Respondent will be made aware of the initiation of a preliminary investigation and that the incident could result in a Student Conduct Process being initiated.
The preliminary investigation may result in any of the following:
Once the initiation of the Student Conduct Process has occurred, the Student, the responsible party for the Student Group, or the president on record with the University for the Student Organization will be provided with a written notice a minimum of two (2) University Business Days before the scheduled meeting, unless exceptional circumstances exist. The notice will include the following:
Notice is considered given to a Student if it is sent to the Student's official @shockers.wichita.edu e-mail address or is mailed to the local address on file with the Office of the Registrar or the permanent address on file. For Student Groups and Student Organizations, notice is considered given if it is sent by any of the aforementioned means to the Student who is the last known president of the Student Engagement and Belonging (SEB) records or the responsible party for the Student Group/Organization, such as an Advisor.
All Respondents are allowed to attend a scheduled informational meeting with the Conduct Administrator responsible for resolving the case. An informational meeting is an informal meeting with a Conduct Administrator who will explain the Respondent's rights and the alleged violation(s), discuss resolution options, review the Respondent's responsibilities, and provide an opportunity to review, after any required redaction, the information that was provided as the basis for the alleged policy violation(s). The representative will also answer questions about the process and available options. The informational meeting provides an opportunity for the Respondent to become more informed about the Student Conduct Process. The Conduct Administrator may provide a range of possible outcomes for the alleged violation, but that individual cannot ensure that a specific outcome will occur.
During the informational meeting, the Respondent may select one of the available resolution processes (Informal Resolution or Formal Resolution) for the case. In certain circumstances, the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or designee may exercise the authority to select the resolution process. In the absence of a resolution option selection from the Respondent, the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or designee shall determine the appropriate resolution process for the case. Failure to attend an informational meeting shall not delay the student conduct proceedings or impact the validity of such proceedings.
If the assigned Conduct Administrator believes the outcome for the alleged violation would likely not rise above disciplinary probation or result in removal from a residential facility or University building/campus, the Respondent may elect to have the case resolved by Informal Resolution. An Informal Resolution takes place between the Respondent and a Conduct Administrator and does not allow for the presentation of witnesses or additional information to be submitted by the Respondent before the meeting, although the administrator may follow up with other parties as necessary before making a decision. Informal Resolutions are not audio recorded.
An Informal Resolution may occur directly following an informational meeting or may be scheduled for a later date. Every effort will be made to schedule an Informal Resolution within five (5) University Business Days of the informational meeting. The Conduct Administrator will determine appropriate outcomes if a Respondent is found in violation of a University Policy.
If the Respondent does not wish to proceed with an Informal Resolution, and/or the outcome of an alleged violation would rise above disciplinary probation, or result in removal from a residential facility or University building/campus, the Respondent may elect to pursue a Hearing. Additionally, a Hearing may be required by SCCS for any case that may result in expulsion.
Conduct Hearings involve the presentation of information by Witnesses (as necessary) and provide an opportunity for the Respondent to present Witnesses and information for review as part of the decision. A list of Witnesses, their relevance to the alleged violation(s), and their contact information must be submitted, in writing, to the Conduct Administrator within five (5) University Business Days after the Informational Meeting.
Student Groups and Student Organizations may submit a resolution proposal for consideration by the Student Conduct Hearing Board within five (5) University Business Days after the informational meeting. The resolution proposal is the Student Group or Student Organization's opportunity to participate collaboratively in the resolution process and reflect on ways to prevent future violations. This document should outline all steps to be taken to remedy the alleged policy violations and timelines for completion. The resolution proposal may be adopted or adapted-in whole or in part-or denied by the Student Conduct Hearing Board assigned to resolve the case.
An Administrator Hearing is conducted by an individual Conduct Administrator as determined by the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards. The Conduct Administrator is responsible for determining whether it is more likely than not that a violation occurred and determine appropriate outcomes(s).
An Administrative Hearing involves the presentation of information by the Respondent(s), Complainant(s) (if applicable), and any Witness(es) (if applicable). The Respondent(s) will be allowed to ask relevant questions of the Complainant(s) and/or any Witness(es) at the discretion of the Conduct Administrator. In incidents involving an identified harmed party, the Complainant(s) will also be allowed to ask relevant questions of the Respondent(s) and/or any Witness(es) at the discretion of the Conduct Administrator.
The Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards, or designee, shall determine the composition of the Student Conduct Hearing Board. Members are appointed for a one-year term with the possibility of reappointment. University governance bodies may recommend individuals for membership to the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards. All members must complete appropriate and thorough training before hearing cases.
A Student Conduct Board Hearing is conducted by a panel of three (3) or five (5) individuals comprised of Students, Instructors, and/or University staff. A minimum of one (1) panelist must be a Student. The Board is responsible for determining whether it is more likely than not that a violation occurred and determine appropriate outcomes(s). One (1) panelist will serve as the Board Chairperson, selected by the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or their designee, and is responsible for communicating the determination of responsibility to the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or designee, who will notify the Respondent(s) and Complainant(s) of the decision. Decisions of the Student Conduct Hearing Board will be determined by a majority vote. A staff member of the SCCS will serve as the Student Conduct Hearing Board Advisor and does not cast a vote.
Hearings will be conducted in private per state privacy laws and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
The Complainant, Respondent, and their respective Advisors are permitted to attend the entire hearing, except for deliberation.
In cases involving multiple Respondents, the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or designee may determine that the hearings be conducted jointly. Any Respondent wanting to have their hearing conducted individually, may submit a written request a minimum of three (3) University Business Days before the scheduled Hearing to the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards or designee who shall decide whether to grant the request.
The Complainant, the Respondent, and the University may arrange for Witnesses to attend the Hearing and present relevant information. Failure to call a Witness, or failure of a Witness to appear shall not automatically require a delay or affect the validity of the proceedings. A decision will be made on the information presented during the hearing.
Witnesses will provide information to, and answer questions from, the hearing body. Questions may be suggested by the Complainant or the Respondent to be answered by each other or by other Witnesses. This will be conducted by the hearing body with such questions directed to the Conduct Administrator or Conduct Board chairperson, rather than to the individual directly. This method is used to preserve the educational tone of the hearing and to avoid the creation of an adversarial environment. The Conduct Administrator and/or the Hearing Board chairperson reserve the right to rephrase the question or to refrain from asking the question. Questions of whether potential information will be received shall be determined by the Conduct Administrator, or Hearing Board chairperson, with the assistance of the Student Conduct Board Advisor.
Relevant records, pictures, written statements, impact statements, and other information may be accepted for consideration for the Hearing when submitted to SCCS within five (5) University Business Days following the informational meeting. A Conduct Administrator may increase the amount of time needed, if needed, pending a written notice from the Respondent or Complainant. If an extension is approved, the Conduct Administrator will notify both the Respondent and Complainant of this extension.
All procedural questions are subject to the final decision of the Conduct Administrator or Hearing Board chairperson with the assistance of the Student Conduct Board Advisor.
If the Respondent has received adequate notice, but fails to attend a hearing without a legitimate reason for being absent, the hearing shall proceed in the Respondent's absence.
SCCS may accommodate concerns for the personal safety, well-being and/or fears of confrontation of the Complainant, Respondent, Reporter, and/or Witnesses during the hearing by providing separate facilities, by using a visual screen, and/or by permitting participation by telephone, videophone, closed-circuit television, video conferencing, videotape, audiotape, written statement, or other means, where the SCCS staff member deems this accommodation to be appropriate.
The Conduct Administrator or Student Conduct Hearing Board will make a finding using the preponderance of the evidence standard. This standard requires that it is more likely than not that a violation occurred. Under this standard, individuals are presumed not to have violated Policy 8.05 / Student Code of Conduct unless a preponderance of the evidence supports a finding that a violation occurred. Formal rules of evidence, procedure, and/or technical rules of evidence, such as those which may be applied in criminal or civil court are not used in University student conduct proceedings.
The Student Conduct Process may be initiated for a Student, Student Group, or Student Organization for behavior that allegedly violates criminal and/or civil law in addition to University Policy. The University is committed to appropriate coordination with the University Police Department and local law enforcement agencies and may (if requested and appropriate) share information with those agencies. If law enforcement requests the University to temporarily suspend the fact-finding aspects of an investigation while the law enforcement agency gathers evidence, the University plans to comply with that request and will promptly resume its investigation upon notification from the law enforcement agency that its evidence gathering process is complete.
The Student Conduct Process may proceed before, simultaneously with, or following criminal or civil proceedings at the discretion of the Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards.
Decisions made within a criminal or civil process do not bind the University to establish or not establish that a violation of University policy has occurred as there are different evidence rules, burdens of proof, purposes, and potential outcomes in each process. However, a criminal conviction based on the same facts, in local, state, or federal courts, shall establish a per se student conduct policy violation.
If a Respondent is also charged with a criminal or civil violation involving the same incident, the Respondent may request up to a 30-day postponement of the Student Conduct Process. The Respondent must make this request in writing within five (5) University Business Days following the date of the informational meeting and must provide a rationale for the request. The Vice President for Student Affairs or designee may determine that it is appropriate to place the Respondent on disciplinary probation or that interim measures be implemented during the time allotted for a postponement on a case-by-case basis. The probation or interim measures will remain in effect until the Student Conduct Process is completed, including any appeal requests. It will be the responsibility of SCCS staff to reinstate the Student Conduct Process at the conclusion of the 30-day postponement.
In cases where a University Community member is directly impacted by the incident, such as a Complainant, they will be allowed to object to a postponement. The Vice President for Student Affairs or designee has full authority to decide whether or not to grant the postponement. A Complainant may also request a 30-day postponement of the hearing if the Complainant has brought criminal or civil charges in a case arising out of the same incident. The Respondent may object to the postponement as described above. If the Complainant requests a postponement, and it is granted against the wishes of the Respondent, the Respondent will not be placed on Disciplinary Probation or given interim measures that would restrict continuing to pursue their education during the period of postponement.
SCCS will attempt to have all meetings in person within Shocker Hall, however, if there are extreme circumstances (Health Crisis, Student is out of town, etc.), SCCS can accommodate and conduct any meeting, including a Hearing, partially or fully over the phone or through a video call platform, such as Zoom or Skype.
SCCS reserves the right to change the meeting format at any time.
Any Student who wishes to adjust the meeting format must email their Conduct Administrator and explain the reason for the adjustment. This request will be approved or denied by the Conduct Administrator.
The outcome of the Student Conduct Process will be sent via e-mail to the Respondent's official University e-mail address. If the Respondent is found to be responsible for a violation of University Policy, the message will also include the assigned sanction(s). Sanctions may be issued individually, or a combination of sanctions may be issued. In the case of Student Groups and Student Organizations, if a sanction issued by a national or other governing body exceeds that of the University, the University may concur with that sanction.
When the actions of a Respondent present an ongoing threat to the health, safety, or well-being of others; disrupt the University Community; or endanger University, public, or private property; the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee may implement interim measures that restrict access for the Respondent pending the outcome of an investigation and resolution process. These interim measures may include, but are not limited to:
The Vice President for Student Affairs or designee will notify the Complainant and Respondent in writing of any interim measures. The measures will take place immediately upon notification. The Respondent will have three (3) University Business Days to e-mail a written request for a Show Cause Hearing to the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee. Upon receipt of a request, the Vice President or designee will conduct a Show Cause Hearing within three (3) University Business Days to determine if the interim measures should be lifted, modified, or kept in place. This is a final decision regarding interim measures unless there are exceptional circumstances that come to light during the investigation.
In circumstances in which the Respondent requests, in writing, that the Vice President of Student Affairs remove themselves from the Show Cause Hearing based on actual or perceived bias, or the Vice President for Student Affairs is otherwise unable to perform these duties, decisions regarding interim measures will be made by the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee.
At any point in the process, interim measures may be implemented. Once in effect, the measures will remain in place until it is determined they are no longer necessary.
Following written notification of the outcome of the Student Conduct Process, Respondents may submit one appeal in accordance with the process outlined below. The burden is on the individual requesting the appeal to prove that the appeal has merit. Appellate reviews are reviews of the record only.
Any Respondent or Complainant who participated in the entire Student Conduct Process and wishes to file an Appeal must do so, in writing within five (5) University Business Days of the date of the outcome letter. Appeal requests may be filed on one or more of the following grounds:
Appeal requests must be submitted in writing via the online Appeal Request Form. Once completed, the Appeal Request Form will be processed by SCCS. SCCS will convene an Appellate Body to review the appeal. The Appellate Body for individual conduct cases will be made up of three (3) or five (5) individuals. Generally, this is two (2) University Staff and one (1) Student or three (3) University Staff and two (2) Students. For organizational conduct issues, the Vice President of Student Affairs, or designee, will convene an Appellate Body consisting of organizational presidents or their designee, organizational governing body members, alumni, advisors, and/or current staff/faculty.
The original Conduct Administrator or Student Conduct Board Advisor will provide a written response to the appeal request within three (3) University Business Days of receiving notice of the appeal request unless a request to extend this time has been made and granted before the expiration of the three (3) University Business Day requirement.
Upon receipt of the appeal request, written response, and case file, the Appellate Body will conduct a review of the file limited to the grounds identified by the filing party. The Appellate Body will issue a written response to the appealing party within five (5) University Business Days unless a request to extend this time has been made and granted before the expiration of the five (5) University Business Day requirement.
Great deference is given to the original decision. The presumption is that the investigation and decision processes were appropriately conducted, and the burden is on the party requesting the appeal to prove the appeal has merit. Appellate reviews are reviews of the record only. There are no additional meetings with the Complainant or Respondent unless there are exceptional circumstances as determined by the Appellate Body, in which case the Appellate Body must offer both the Complainant and the Respondent the same opportunity to discuss the case.
Upon review of the record, the Appellate Body may respond as follows:
The Appellate Body's decision is considered the final University decision and will be communicated in writing. The Appellate Body will review and respond to the appeal within five (5) University Business Days of receipt of all documentation but may extend this time for specific reasons that will be communicated in writing to the appealing party.
In circumstances in which the appealing party requests, in writing, that the Appellate Body remove themselves from the appeal based on actual or perceived bias, or in cases in which the Appellate Body is otherwise unable to perform these duties, appeal decisions may be made by another Appellate Body as determined by the Vice President for Student Affairs.
SCCS staff, the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee, Housing and Residence Life staff, and/or the Vice President for Student Affairs may place a hold on a Student's transcript, registration, and/or diploma; or remove a Student Group and/or Student Organization's active status and ability to conduct operations in any of the following situations:
Student conduct records, including investigation records, are maintained electronically by SCCS for seven (7) years from the date the case is closed. A record is considered closed when the following criteria have been met:
If a Student remains enrolled after the record is closed, the record will be maintained until the Student graduates or is no longer enrolled at the University. When a Student proceeds directly from one academic program into another academic program (e.g. undergraduate study to graduate study), the records will be maintained until the completion of the final academic program. Student Group and Student Organization records will be maintained for a minimum of seven (7) years after the record is closed. Records of incidents culminating in Disciplinary Suspension, Disciplinary Expulsion, or Disciplinary Dismissal will be permanently maintained by the University.
If a Student, Student Group, or Student Organization wishes to review their conduct file, they may do so by scheduling an appointment with SCCS. The file may be redacted to protect privacy concerns and to comply with federal and local law.
If a student needs access to their records for legal reasons, admission to another school, or any other reason (to be approved by SCCS), they can email SCCS@wichita.edu to petition to receive their record via email. If approved, the written records requested will be sent to the email address that was used to contact SCCS. The written records will be redacted when it is sent to the Student.
Additionally, SCCS can mail a redacted copy of the conduct file upon request and at the expense of the requestor to be paid in advance of preparing it for transfer. Payment must be received before the release of the records. Reasonable costs for making copies, transcribing audio recordings (if necessary), and/or staff time spent redacting personally identifiable information of other students may be included in calculated costs.
Access to records only applies to the Respondent, not that of an Advisor and/or family member, without the express written consent designated in a FERPA Form.
Police reports may be obtained by contacting the records department at the law enforcement agency which issued the report. In the State of Kansas, police reports are not considered public records; therefore, limited information will be accessible upon request.
Students may request to have their conduct record expunged under the conditions listed below. Expungement shall be at the sole discretion of the Vice President for Student Affairs or designee and shall require the entire record to be expunged or none of it to be expunged (i.e. no partial expungement shall be allowed). Conditions include:
The University reserves the right to notify the parent(s)/guardian(s) of dependent Students and/or a Student's emergency contact regarding any conduct situation which poses a health or safety risk to the student or others, particularly alcohol and/or other drug violations. The University may also notify the parent(s)/guardian(s) of non-dependent Students who are under the age of twenty-one (21) of alcohol and/or other drug violations. Parental notification may also be utilized discretionarily by Conduct Administrators when permitted by FERPA or consent of the student.